By
Andrew Mulenga
Shortly
after President Edgar Lungu took office early this year, an inquiry was put
forth in this column, under the headline “Is Edgar for the arts?”
Very
little was known about the president at the time be it his personal character
or his plans for the country. As for the arts, the speculation was worse as to whether
he would consider them like his predecessor and mentor Michael Sata whose
legacy, the realignment of the Tourism and Arts Ministry and the Arts, Culture
and Heritage Commission Bill was a huge step forward, that gave hope to notions
of a legitimate creative sector with the trappings of a national budgetary
allocation and job creation.
But in
August, seven months down the line, the President appeared to give the arts a first
flicker of hope during a trip to Botswana where the Zambia Daily Mail’s Steven Mvula reported that the president had
observed that the Zambian art scene was sterile.
“Zambia
is lagging behind in terms of arts and theatre. The creative industry can give
our women and youths a decent living. NAC is no longer doing what it is
supposed to be doing. That is my own assertion. But we will be sitting down
with colleagues and ensure that bickering comes to an end. We will see to it
that the issues that are making the Council not deliver are sorted out,” stated
Mvula quoting the president’s response to a question while the head of state
was addressing Zambian’s based in Botswana.
On
Friday, 18th September, a month later, the president was making his official
speech for the opening of the National Assembly in Parliament; of course politics being what
they are, the speech was hauled over the coals by the opposition and critics,
cited as empty and unworkable rhetoric in the midst of an ailing economy and the
soaring cost of living that accompanies it. But surprisingly somewhere in this alleged
drivel, he kept his word on looking into to the issue of the country’s shambolic
state of the arts, giving the subject prominence, and likewise giving the
artistic community another flicker of hope.
“The
Minister responsible for Tourism and Arts will bring to this House the Arts,
Culture and Heritage Bill aimed at harmonising institutional arrangements in
arts, culture and heritage to reduce overheads and promote cost effectiveness,”
read his speech in part.
In a
segment where he announced that he had directed the Secretary to the Cabinet to
ensure continuous improvement to institutionalised pubic services, President
Lungu declared that arts, culture and heritage, despite having economic
potential as sectors had either been “overlooked by policymakers or
inadequately addressed with piecemeal or traditional approaches”, and that this
had created challenges in coordination, planning and resource allocation.
“Consequently,
opportunities have largely not been effectively utilised in not only creating a
vibrant national identity, but also in tapping into a sector that can contribute
meaningfully to our economic growth and major contributor to the job or career
market,” read the speech.
The speech
pointed out that his predecessor directed the Ministry of Tourism and Arts to
establish a National Arts, Culture and Heritage Commission as a directive that
was intended to accelerate the creative industry’s contribution to economic
development.
“In this
regard, the repeal of the National Arts Council of Zambia ACT, No. 31 of 1994, is
fundamental to the successful implementation of the directive. I am happy to
inform you Mr Speaker, and Honourable Members, that my government with the
input of stakeholders in the creative industry, has worked hard to produce the
draft culture and heritage bill which will be brought to your attention before
the end of the year.
“This
house has already supported the initial funding to create a national arts,
culture and heritage commission as reflected in the 2015 budget in which an
amount of K3, 500,000 was approved by this parliament for this purpose. The
newly created commission will improve the coordination, administration and
management of the arts, culture and heritage sector in this country” read the
section of the speech under the title Arts, Culture and Heritage.
But a
month after his speech in parliament, the president gave the arts a third flicker
of hope when on 17 October he officially opened the National Art Exhibition at
the Henry Tayali Gallery and signed the visitors book, in it, leaving remarks
that tally with his parliamentary speech.
“Let’s
create a living for our people out of their talents by making art an economic
activity”, wrote President Lungu, stamped and dated “H.E. Mr. Edgar C. Lungu,
President, and Republic of Zambia”.
Well, at
long last, there finally seems to be quantifiable political will towards supporting
the arts, complete with a presidential stamp of approval, the pursuit of this
approval of which has been a hymn for the past decade in this column, giving a
voice to the many individuals that have incessantly campaigned for this direction.
No doubt there is jubilation particularly in the visual arts community as they
have often felt the most neglected in terms of private or public sponsorship
compared to their counterparts in music, film, fashion, theatre and the literary
arts.
But as
artistes across the creative field await the bill to be passed, it must be
noted that government sanctioned support may bring along its own problems. If
you look at all the three instances mentioned here Botswana, Parliament and the
Henry Tayali Gallery, the President is talking livelihood vis-à-vis job
creation and he is also talking figures, which means money, all of which are a
sound recipe for greed. It can be argued that greed and not necessarily the
lack of sanctioned support has been an impediment in Zambian arts
administration at every level for a very long time where we individuals who have
personalized the respective arts governing bodies that they oversee and have
created miniature empires in them, these are individuals who do not see
anything beyond the next workshop allowance or foreign conference that benefits
no one but themselves. So instead of just a name change and reshuffling of these
bodies into so-called commissions, there will be need for an absolute overhaul,
or purge for lack of a better term.
Nevertheless,
for the creative sector to be fully functional as a player in the country’s
economy as seems to be the President’s vision, there will be need for
infrastructure. Zambia has no national theatre, no national gallery, youth art centres
for developing talent and the two major universities do not regard the arts as
a field of academic study. Zambia has no gallerists, no curators, no arts
agents and no arts scholars to critique the arts after all the arts are
developed by professional and academic evaluation. The sector is going to need
training and qualified staff if things are going to work, the sector will also
need proper professional regulation where only registered artistes will be eligible
for grants and opportunities to avoid a free-for-all, “sangwapo” situation that
may defeat the indispensable purpose of professionalism.
It was
written in this space just a couple of weeks ago that in Germany, the city of
Berlin alone generates an annual income of over 700 million euro and has 6,600
employees, well this of course is not by accident, there are more than 400
galleries and over 2,600 active companies within the Berlin art world, so
investment in infrastructure is inevitable. It was also mentioned that Art
school graduates as well as individuals who work in the creative industries are
eligible for a wide range of financial assistance from the German government
and that merely the show of a university degree from an art school officially
guaranteed you to be labelled a “professional” artist meaning artistic grants
and scholarships be benefited from the state, applying for a government grant
is the equivalent of applying for a job. Ultimately by so doing, the German
government was enviably tackling a thread of unemployment. In Germany all arts
funding is administered on two levels, municipal and state. This is because
through research, it has been observed that local arts administrator know the
interests of their communities better, they also know the quality and needs of
the artists who live there. It should also be mentioned that most of Berlin’s
art does not stay in the city or in Germany it is exported to the global art,
London, New York, Paris and so on, similarly, the world’s major galleries have
found a hunting ground for young talent in the city, which also attracts
foreign young artists.
Of
course the German model might sound like a very foreign, first-world and extravagant
example but it is testimony that investing in the arts, both through infrastructure
and education can provide fruitful results.
Unquestionably,
the placing of infrastructure and the restructuring of higher education to make
the sector viable may be a long term project, but as soon as government policy
falls in to place to fund the arts, the first and most straightforward things
to do is launch annual international arts fairs and invite the world to
participate, this would not only help showcase Zambia to the world – which also
seems to be the presidents concern – but it will also fill hotels, guest houses,
sell out car hire companies and fill the pockets of the tour guides
instantaneously.
It has
been done before and can be done again, all that was required was the political
will. Indeed, Zambia may not have the expertise at the moment but neither did
it have the expertise when it held the International Art Exhibition or National
Exhibition of Art and Culture in 1964. As highlighted recently, coming from a
restrictive academic system towards locals, as a new nation, Zambia did not yet
have academically trained artists or curators in, so Frank McEwen from the
Rhodes National Gallery in Salisbury, Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) was brought in to put
up the display. Modern art giants like Picasso, Braque, Brancusi and Henry
Moore were his personal friends and he often shipped their work to Rhodesia for
temporary display, so bringing such a character in was no mean achievement.
Of
course 50 years down the line we do have capable Zambians that have been doing
and are still doing an outstanding work under the circumstances, but the
ability to hang paintings in a gallery does not make one a curator, one does
not just wake up and label themselves a curator as much as one does not wake up
and say I am a chef, a doctor, an accountant or a pilot. Unfortunately the job
demands a lot of things like the scholarly formulation of artistic themes and
the meticulous selection of work not to mention the publishing of opinion shaping
exhibition catalogues that can be presented as scholarly literature at any
international art symposium, museum, gallery or in a university library. The
problem is that as Zambians we have the habit of betraying the truth by not
admitting when we do not know what we are doing.
In 2013,
again as published in this column, Angola was in a similar position as Zambia
is today, virtually unchartered territory on the global art scene, eager to
introduce itself the Angolan Government through the Ministry of Culture hired Stefano Rabolli Pansera, an
Italian curator to work with a local team and sponsored a pavilion at the
Venice Biennale, which is considered the Olympics or World Cup of contemporary
art. The Angola pavilion was in the Cini Palace
alongside the heavyweights, Germany, France and Denmark to name a few. Much
to the world’s amazement, Angola stole the show and was honoured with the
coveted Golden Lion Award for the best pavilion, making it the first
sub-Saharan country to do so defying the odds against some very stiff
competition. The Angolan artist Edson Chagas who was featured in the space used
it as a launching pad and is now booked all year round at international
galleries, art fairs and museums, flying his country’s flag high.
If Angola can do it, so can
Zambia. Zimbabwe too has been in attendance for the past three years spearheaded
by Chief Curator at the National Gallery of Zimbabwe, Raphael Chikukwa who is
just next door for consultation. If Zambia is to re-launch herself to the world
through arts and culture, Venice 2017 will be a good starting point, there is
ample time to prepare, and answering that February question, perhaps President
Lungu is for the arts, but in the words of Dennis Liwewe, “let's wait and see!”