By
Andrew Mulenga
According
to the article, he went on further to state: “Norway’s external interests
outside are very much linked to oil and there is no oil in this country, and
related to the marine, shipping industry, there is no harbour in this country,
so it is difficult to say that Norwegian companies will be coming very strongly
but there are some coming in agriculture and in energy and maybe that will grow
further.”
“I want
to put on record that the Zambian cultural sector, particularly the arts,
received the biggest donor support ever from Zambia’s development cooperation
with Norway, and this support covered all the art disciplines; namely, visual
arts, music, theatre, dance, media and literary arts. Norway has truly been a
friend,” read the speech in part. In conclusion, her speech was a direct appeal
to the ambassadors present to consider as parting gifts the donation of their
old embassy buildings to the people of Zambia for use as national galleries -- whenever
a consulate is leaving.
As much
as the Norwegian embassy in Lusaka’s donation of 40 works to the Lechwe Trust
Collection has brought a certain degree of approval within the Zambian visual
arts community, there are concerns towards the impending departure of the Norwegians
themselves, however, Ambassador Arve Ofstad assured Zambia that bilateral
collaborations in the field of arts and culture will possibly remain open-ended.
Here I am, 1997, ebony, sand-stone, metal, 122 x 71 x 48.5 cm by Flinto Chandia (Photo credit: Lechwe Trust) |
Addressing
invited members of the diplomatic community, prominent collectors and
personalities on the local art scene, representatives of arts organisations,
government institutions, the media and artists during the opening of “Donation”
the on-going commemorative exhibition at the Lusaka National Museum, he expressed
confidence that the donation will contribute towards an early realisation of
the Lechwe Trust’s long term ambitions to create a permanent display of
contemporary Zambian art that will help preserve national cultural heritage and
benefit locals and visiting tourists.
“Most of
the artworks on display were acquired by the Embassy during the 1990s, a period
when the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) explicitly
supported cultural nation-building through individual artists, art
institutions, as well as the organisation of arts in Zambia,” stated the
ambassador who has been head of mission for the past five years.
He
pointed out that through NORAD, his government funded activities such as
renovations of the Henry Tayali Visual Arts Centre in Lusaka, support towards
the Visual Arts Council offices in Livingstone and Chipata.
“This
collaboration also directly involved several Norwegian artists, who were
greatly inspired by their Zambian experience. This productive interaction
continues to this day involving Norwegian institutions such as the Academy of
Fine Art (Kunstakademiet) in Oslo and Kunstbanken Hedmark Kunstsenter, in
Hamar,” he continued.
Before attempting
to clarify his embassy impending closure, he stated that the display of
artworks was part of Zambia’s continued cultural nation-building and the
individual works were building blocks in her identity, and as such, they
constitute part of the world’s cultural exchange. A heritage he stated, that
will continue to be shared in the future.
Ambassador Arve Ofstad and Lechwe Trust Chairperson Cynthia Zukas exchange art catalogues at the Lusaka National Museum (Photo by Andrew Mulenga) |
“Let me
now add a few words about the closing of Norway’s Embassy in Lusaka. I am not
happy about this, but it is a decision by my Minister of Foreign Affairs, who
has to make the best use of Norway’s resources in order to promote Norway’s
interests in the world, in the same way as Zambia has to prioritise its
resources for diplomatic representations.
“The
decision-makers in Norway believe that our development aid is even more needed
in other countries, which are poorer than Zambia, or more affected by natural
or political crises. Norway wishes to focus our cooperation on fewer countries
and sectors,” he added.
He maintained
that at the same time, Norwegian business interests were growing in Zambia, although
not yet well established and that perhaps in the future, a growth of commercial
interest, tourism and other interactions may warrant a re-opening of the
Embassy.
“Let me
add, with reference to an article in the Post Newspaper today, that I feel I
have been quoted somewhat out of context, or maybe I did not express myself
clearly enough. It is correct that we from the Norwegian side have been
concerned about some development issues and challenges in Zambia, as in fact
many Zambians also feel. But these issues are not the reason for closing the
embassy,” stated the ambassador.
Mother and child breast-feeding, 1993, oil on canvas, 137 x 107 cm by Dabson Njobvu |
He
stated that he hoped for more opportunities to clarify the departure and that
he hopes the countries share common interests in promoting democracy, peaceful
development, and women’s emancipation and as such the two countries will find
common grounds in international platforms for the promotion of these values.
“I am
sad to leave a Zambia where there are still so many development challenges. I
nevertheless hope that the Embassy has left behind some positive footprints,
and as I have said on other occasions, Norway is not leaving Zambia, we just
have to find new ways of communication. I trust that we will meet again,”
stated Ofstad.
In a
related story by Mukosha Funga published in the Sunday Post of 10 April under the headline “It’s pointless to keep funding a country that can’t manage
its own resources – Ofstad”, ambassador Ofstad asserted a more caustic tone
insinuating corruption and the lack of certain mineral resources among the main
reasons for the departure.
“…there
was also the feeling that the anti-corruption fight has been going very much up
and down and we feel that when a country doesn’t make enough use of its own
resources, is not doing well enough in terms of public resource management, in
terms of its distributional policies, then we should leave,” read Ofstad’s quote
in part.
Township, 1990, oil on canvas by Style Kunda |
Further
addressing the tourism question he declared that as much as there is fantastic
wildlife in Zambia, the tourism industry is undeveloped and Norwegians had been
losing their passports here so they have found it was more necessary to keep their
embassies elsewhere.
Nevertheless,
this latest donation to Lechwe Trust is its second gift from a departing
European embassy, the first being that presented by the defunct Royal
Netherlands Embassy who similarly donated works by Zambians in the guise of
supporting cultural heritage in 2013. Anyhow, in a speech read on behalf of
Minister of Tourism and Arts, Jean Kapata by permanent secretary Stephen Mwansa
during the opening of the “Donation” exhibition, she was grateful for the
assistance from the broader diplomatic community and pleaded for continued
support towards the arts.
Copies of the Donation catalogue are available from the Lusaka National Museum and the Henry Tayali Gallery in Lusaka |
The
announcement of the departure and remarks from Ofstad however attracted swift
condemnation from Oslo-based Victor Mutelekesha, one of Zambia’s leading visual
arts exports to Norway in an e-mail dated April 19 addressed to the ambassador
and copied to several Zambian media houses.
“I read
with disappointment that you will be closing down the Norwegian Embassy in
Zambia largely due to corruption. This is the decision Norway has made so I
can’t stop that. But I have few questions that need answering because siting
corruption as the reason for closing down the embassy is slightly misguiding
and gives a very wrong impression about Zambia,” wrote the 40 –year old who
studied has a BA and MA Fine Arts from the National Arts Academy in Oslo and
has lived there for 15 years exhibiting extensively partially through Norwegian
government grants and awards.
He argued
that Angola ranks among the 6 lowest countries on the transparency
international corruption index list (2015) and yet Norway was maintaining an
embassy there. He further argued that according to the same transparency listing
, Zambia ranked number 76 on the corruption index beating Tanzania at 117,
Kenya at 139, Uganda at 139, China at 86, Russia at 119, Nigeria at 136 and
Malawi where the Norwegian embassy is relocating to sis at 112.
“Unless it’s
something I haven't read or come across, but I know that your current government’s
Policy is to realign its global strategy/commitments and closing and relocating
some embassies is one way of doing that,” continued Mutelekesha “Yes there is
corruption in Zambia and there is misappropriation of money here and there but
if that was the main reason of leaving Zambia then I truly expect Norway to
close more than half its embassies around the world, unless otherwise. Mr
Ambassador, complete truth goes a long way in establishing young democracies.
Injecting blame politics at such a crucial moment in Zambia’s election calendar
doesn’t help.”
Donation Service Solution handles the donation though different donors and the management of donations for the beneficiary.
ReplyDelete